On Wednesday we had a group class with all Digital Arts students. Everyone introduced themselves and discussed their projects. Such a bunch of interesting people with a wide range of ideas. There are some concurrent themes that run through many of the works. The loudest of these I guess is INTERACTIVITY, the topic of Thursday’s symposium. It seems that there is often an assumption of interactivity in digital art. I think this is ridiculous. To me, ‘digital art’ is the most wide ranging of all art forms as it can use any creation method as well any format of transmission/broadcast/exhibition. But it can still be a ‘closed’ work.
The feedback and suggestions I received from the class about my project made reference to Wolfgang Goethe and John Gage’s work on colour theory and Norman McLaren’s film work where he scratches into the audio track of analogue film.
The interactivity symposium was fantastic. The definition needed to be thrashed out early on as all communication can be thought of as interactive. I thought about when art started to incorporate interactivity and came up with Bertold Brecht ‘Radio Theory’ from the 1920’s in which he proposed the use of the new radio technology for (2 way) communication rather than (1 way) distribution. The 1960’s happenings and the Fluxus movement changed the relationship between artist and audience by pushing the boundaries of ‘what/where is the art?’.
We discussed the value of instructions in digital art. Some strongly opposed opinions. Things keep coming back to language, where there is an assumed level of computer language, there’s no need for instructions.
I spent an exciting show and tell afternoon in the lab with Lousia. I’ve been wrestling with making this blog in html in dreamweaver because I’m determined to learn. But I’m constantly offended by my inability to layout my page tastefully so I’m going to use a pre-formatted blogger page and learn to make websites with flash for something else, like my portfolio and new work. Why reinvent the wheel?